Will Pakistan use EVMs for the 2007 elections

What is an error-free voter list
March 27, 2019
bureaucracy and carbon foot print
March 27, 2019


Will Pakistan use EVMs for the 2007 elections?


For many million Indians, who had never switched on a light bulb in their lives, pressing an electronic voting machine button was their first contact with the 21st century – and that too at a level that would be envious for many of the most technologically advanced nations.  Remember the confusion  and crudeness of vote counting in the Bush-Gore elections just a few years ago. The electronic voting machines (EVMs) bring a completely new dimension, methodology, and character  to the election process.  Gone are the days of  carefully folded ballot papers with a voter’s stamp that indistinguishably lay any where between 2 to 3 possible candidates, the  indelible ink impression on your one or the other thumb, sealing, locking, opening, re-opening stuffing,  re-stuffing, counting, re-counting, and transporting, storing, securing and final counting  of ballot boxes – till the results matched the intended outcomes.   Also gone are  the days, when an  election  would end up consuming dozens of forests in printing of millions of ballot papers and making of thousands of ballot boxes –  and imagine the exercise repeated  for every new election.


One must give credit to the  Indian Election Commission, for initiating the  Electronic Voting Machine (EVM) development project way back in 1989, in collaboration with  Bharat Electronics Ltd. and Electronic Corporation of India Ltd.   The Indian Electronic Voting Machine consists of two Units,  a Control Unit and a Balloting Unit  – joined by a five-meter cable. The Control Unit is held with the  Polling Officer and the Balloting Unit is placed inside the voting compartment. Instead of issuing a ballot paper, the Polling Officer  presses the Ballot Button on his Control Unit.   This  enables the voter to cast his vote by pressing the blue button on the Balloting Unit against the candidate and symbol of his choice. The EVM runs on an ordinary 6 volt alkaline battery, and the data is not lost even when the battery is disconnected.


The EVMs (almost a million of them)  were designed and manufactured in India,  except for the assembly language based  micro processor chip, which was  manufactured in USA and sealed at the time of import.  The EVMs  are not just high tech gadgets, but bring with them a host of solutions and improvements in the otherwise highly messy  ad error-prone election process.   The EVMs are temper-proof, provide almost instantaneous results,  don’t make counting errors,  are simpler to use than the traditional vote stamping process, and preclude the possibilities of multiple voting by the same person. As soon as a button on the Balloting Unit is pressed, the vote is recorded for that particular candidate and the machine gets locked. Even if one presses the button for the second time, no further vote is recorded. This way the EVMs ensure the principle of “one man, one vote”.  In case of any external disturbance, or at the end of the polling day,  the  Polling Officers can press the “lock” button, that seals the  EVM,  and prevents acceptance of any further votes. The concept of false vote, dummy vote, duplicate vote or an invalid vote is thus relegated to history.


Pakistan is preparing for elections in the year 2007. Will we go through these elections in the same ancient manner?   Will we use the  same hollow slogans of “azadana, munsifana and gher janibdarana” , resort to same practices of  election tinkering and end up with the same  set of uncles and nephews?   Are we not going to learn a lesson from our next door neighbour?  Are we not going to challenge our failure-prone, violent and manipulative election process?   Is it not obvious  that having a  retired chief justice as the Chief Election Commissioner, by itself does not guarantee an efficient and fool proof election mechanism?   We need to challenge every step of this process, use technology to cut out human interference, make it go through scientific process improvement techniques,   provide rigorous training to the concerned staff and get rid of the manual manipulations by using  electronic vote counting machines.   Unless we intentionally intend to retain the ancient voting system for its “obvious advantages”, we need to immediately get on with the development of modern EVMs for our next elections.  The Chief Election Commissioner should take the ownership of this project, and collaborate with other concerned institutions (HEC, NADRA, MoST, industry , academia etc.) for development, manufacture,  trials and training on EVMs, well before the 2007 election time. Can the Pakistani citizens  look forward to  pressing for the first time, a button on a Pakistan-designed and built Electronic Vote Counting Machine in the year 2007?



Naeem Sadiq